首页> 外文OA文献 >Pain, quality of life and safety outcomes of kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
【2h】

Pain, quality of life and safety outcomes of kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

机译:椎体后凸成形术治疗椎体压缩性骨折的疼痛,生活质量和安全性结果:美国骨与矿物研究学会专题小组的报告。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The relative efficacy and harms of balloon kyphoplasty (BK) for treating vertebral compression fractures (VCF) are uncertain. We searched multiple electronic databases to March 2016 for randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing BK with control treatment (non-surgical management [NSM], percutaneous vertebroplasty [PV], KIVA®, vertebral body stenting, or other) in adults with VCF. Outcomes included back pain, back disability, quality of life (QoL), new VCF and adverse events (AE). One reviewer extracted data, a second checked accuracy, and two rated risk of bias (ROB). Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using inverse-variance models. Risk ratios of new VCF and AE were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel models. Ten unique trials enrolled 1,837 participants (age range: 61-76 years, 74% female), all rated as having high or uncertain ROB. Versus NSM, BK was associated with greater reductions in pain, back-related disability, and better QoL (k = 1 trial) that appeared to lessen over time, but were less than minimally clinically important differences. Risk of new VCF at 3 and 12 months was not significantly different (k = 2 trials). Risk of any AE was increased at 1 month (RR = 1.73 [1.36, 2.21]). There were no significant differences between BK and PV in back pain, back disability, QoL, risk of new VCF or any AE (k = 1 to 3 trials). Limitations included lack of a BK versus sham comparison, availability of only one RCT of BK versus NSM, and lack of study blinding. Individuals with painful VCF experienced symptomatic improvement compared with baseline with all interventions. The clinical importance of the greater improvements with BK versus NSM is unclear, may be due to placebo effect, and may not counterbalance short-term AE risks. Outcomes appeared similar between BK and other surgical interventions. Well-conducted randomized trials comparing BK with sham would help resolve remaining uncertainty about the relative benefits and harms of BK. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
机译:球囊后凸成形术(BK)治疗椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)的相对功效和危害尚不确定。我们在2016年3月之前搜索了多个电子数据库,以比较BK与成人VCF的对照治疗(非手术管理[NSM],经皮椎体成形术[PV],KIVA®,椎体支架置入术或其他)的随机和半随机对照试验。结果包括背部疼痛,背部残疾,生活质量(QoL),新的VCF和不良事件(AE)。一位审阅者提取了数据,另一位检查了准确性,并得出了两个额定偏差风险(ROB)。使用反方差模型计算平均差异和95%置信区间。使用Mantel-Haenszel模型计算新的VCF和AE的风险比。十项独特的试验招募了1,837名参与者(年龄范围:61-76岁,女性74%),所有这些均被认为具有较高或不确定的ROB。与NSM,BK相比,疼痛,背部相关性残疾的减轻和QoL的改善(k = 1试验)随着时间的推移逐渐减轻,但在临床上的重要差异最小。 3个月和12个月时发生新的VCF的风险没有显着差异(k = 2次试验)。在1个月时发生任何AE的风险均增加(RR = 1.73 [1.36,2.21])。 BK和PV在背部疼痛,背部残疾,QoL,新的VCF风险或任何AE风险方面无显着差异(k = 1至3项试验)。局限性包括缺乏BK与假手术的比较,只有BK与NSM的一个RCT的可用性以及缺乏研究盲法。与所有干预措施相比,VCF疼痛的患者症状改善。尚不清楚BK与NSM相比有更大改善的临床重要性,这可能是由于安慰剂作用,并且可能无法抵消短期AE风险。 BK和其他手术干预之间的结果似乎相似。如果将BK与假手术进行比较,则进行良好的随机试验将有助于解决有关BK相对利弊的不确定性。本文受版权保护。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号